|
Ad rate
for this page is: |
|
0.8p per
pixel or less |
|
In this
section ... |



 |
|
Advertise
here
|
|
170 pixel width by any
length up to 600 pixels. Rates are as described on our 'Ad
Rates' page |
|
170 pixel width box - any
length up to 600 pixels |
|
|
US Government: Fence & Defence
The borders between the US
and it's neighbouring countries , especially Mexico, can
range from comprehensive to non-existent. But where no
fence exists, one is faced with crossing vast, and
possible hostile wildernesses. It's your choice! |
"Injustice anywhere is a
threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an
inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment
of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all
indirectly."
- Martin Luther King, Jnr.
"I have always found
that mercy bears richer fruits than strict justice."
- Abraham Lincoln
|
Go to USFENCE:
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7
|
|
|
PDF
|
|
PAGE
COUNT
= 7 |
|
DOC
COUNT
= 1 |
|
|
PDF
VERSION: |
|
Full
Article |
 |
|
|
PDF
VERSION: |
|
- |
 |
|
|
PDF
VERSION: |
|
- |
 |
|
|
PDF
VERSION: |
|
- |
 |
|
|
PDF
VERSION: |
|
- |
 |
|
|
|
USFENCE
1 | Go to USFENCE:
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 |
Top of page |
|
Incredible, incredulous and 'inde-fens-ible'!
 |
In places, this is all that
stands between Mexico and the US. The Americans have to
rely upon, for example, helicopter patrols and radar. The
actual physical deterrent is virtually non-existent. Where
are the signs telling the observer that the US is on the
other side of this fence? If they are there, then how far
apart are they? What happens if you cross the border and
get caught? What happens if you don't get caught? |
Well, it depends where you come
from. Mexico may be the obvious answer, but it could also be
someone just using Mexico to cross into the US. They could
could come from anywhere around the world.
While the US is concerned more
about anti-terrorism, it's not just terrorists who will be the
problem. Drug-smuggling and general people-trafficking are the
other two areas of major concern.
Another way for Mexicans to try
to gain entry to the US is via Canada. During my own very
brief stay as a 'guest' of the Canadian authorities, I chatted
briefly to a young Mexican lady (her name is Paola). She had
flown into Canada for a very short stay to, so she claims, for
a short holiday.
This raised suspicions amongst
Canadian officials. Although she seemed perfectly entitled to
be in Canada, the mere suspicion she may try to enter the US
via the Canadian border was enough for the authorities to stop
her entering the country. There again, perhaps they thought
she may just attempt to stay in Canada illegally.
It cannot be emphasised enough
that the arbitrary decisions made by immigration officials in
the US and it's neighbouring countries can be made mostly upon
suspicion. Credentials and real purpose count for little. But
back to the issue of border protection ...
For a country so concerned about
border protection, it appears to be doing very little in
places to prevent illegal entry to the country. In fact, the
US appears to be relying more upon the geographical
'hostility' of certain locations (desert, etc.) to discourage
attempts to get over the border. Part 2 of this feature will
look at numerous locations to see exactly how much of a
deterrent exists for potential illegal immigrants. We'll also
provide links where useful software can be downloaded to
expose vulnerable areas of the border.
Getting caught
If you are Mexican, you'll just
be sent back home. With illegal immigration at such high
levels, and millions being apprehended and returned on a
regular basis, the Mexican authorities are not going to do
much to deter these people trying to get back to the US. After
all, if the Americans do not have the facilities to imprison
illegal immigrants, in an attempt to discourage any further
attempts to enter the country, then the Mexicans are certainly
not going to be able to handle the problem either. Mexico will
actually gain from it's people entering the US, legally or
otherwise. If those who cannot earn a living in Mexico remain
in their own country, it will put a strain on many of the
resources there. Better these people go somewhere else and be
someone else's problem.
With no real deterrent to
prevent people trying time and time again to enter the US,
then it's just a matter of time before someone succeeds. And
once one person finds away across the border, more will
follow.
|
|
|
USFENCE
2 | Go to USFENCE:
1 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 |
Top of page |
|
Those who also specialise in
trying to get people across the border will also probably pay
good money for information on weak spots on the US-Mexican
border. The Americans are therefore open to a persistent and
vigorous attempt to encroach their territory. The only way to
lessen this problem is to throw money at it. But with the Bush
administration spending vast sums of money on the wars in the
Middle East, the defence of the US will likely depend more
upon the level of Patriotism in it's individuals rather than
the facilities provided to them to do a more competent job.
I recall a quote from a former
work employee who once said of our poorly paid managerial jobs
that one only would do the job for the love of it, not the
money. I'm not sure how much border guards get paid, but a job
such as theirs is not a very rewarding one. Not unless they
see it as a sport and actually enjoy the daily routine of
chasing after illegal immigrants.
But what if your country of
origin is not Mexico? Rules of deportation say that you must
be returned to your own country of origin - that is the
country that issued your passport. So, and for arguments sake,
if you go legally as a tourist to (for example) Canada or
Mexico, and are then caught illegally attempting to enter the
US, you get sent back to which country you are a citizen of.
No more holiday.
Human Rights
It's more than ironic that if
you enter the US illegally, you will have to be 'processed' by
US authorities and treated as though you are on American soil.
But if, like me, you try to enter legally and honestly, then
you have to do so via a recognised portal (such as an
International Airport) where you have NOT officially entered
the country until you have cleared immigration. Ergo, you will
be entitled to more human rights as an illegal than those
legally attempting to enter the US (see
My Story). How perverse is this? Very, it appears!
Criminality
The term 'illegal' can be
deceptive. Earlier this year is was ruled that the
apprehension of people illegally in the US was merely the
responsibility of the US immigration authorities. As such, law
enforcement agencies could not get involved unless the
immigrant committed a breach of law which the police could
process. Merely being in the US was outside the remit of the
police.
It raises the thorny issue of
local police forces being used to 'supplement' the actions
taken by immigration officials when attempting to round-up
illegal immigrants. In some States, the police will co-operate
with immigration authorities. In other States, they are not
even allowed to ask someone if they are illegal. And even
where they know a person may be illegally in the country, they
cannot do anything about it (except tip-off immigration)! I
repeat, in some States the police are not entitled to
apprehend or detain illegal immigrants unless they have broken
some criminal law. President Bush is attempting to address
this issue, but has been met with resistance. Not that those
who oppose the police aiding immigration officials are
pro-Mexican (or whichever country they come from), but because
the involvement of the police moves the problem of illegal
immigration into a whole new arena.
Involving the police means that
those who are apprehended can now use the full force of US law
to try to avoid being deported. Effectively, involving the
police in deportation matters can criminalise the victims and
this opens a whole new can of worms. The victims can call upon
the services of lawyers (possibly at the tax-payers cost) and
the full force of the US Constitution to try to avoid being
deported on the grounds of criminality. OK, while they may
still be able to do this without the police being involved, it
at least reduces the cost of deporting someone and keeps the
issue one of civil rather than criminal law.
This is why some police forces
would prefer not to be entangled with issues of immigration.
It's too expensive and diverting resources from other areas of
need!
The existing practice of leaving
immigration matters purely up to immigration authorities is
simpler. Apprehension and processing of illegal immigrants can
be done without impinging upon the resources (financial or
otherwise) of other agencies. There are going to be many
vested interests attempting to ensure it remains this way. But
if President Bush does get his way, then the mess he will
leave behind for his successor in 2009 will be a nasty one.
|
|
|
USFENCE
3 | Go to USFENCE:
1 -
2 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 |
Top of page |
|
Solution
If large international
businesses were to pay foreign workers a decent wage, and
provide them with decent basic needs, such as medical and the
educational needs of their families, then perhaps not so many
foreigners would try to enter the US illegally.
But as long as said businesses
exploit cheap 'slave' labour in other countries, purely for
the benefits of making larger profits, then nothing will
change. It could even be argued that illegal immigrants have
EVERY right to be in the US. As I said in a letter to my
Member of Parliament in the UK: Is it better that someone
should work for a US company in their own country for around
$1 A DAY, or go to the US and work for another US
company for around $9 AN HOUR? It's a 'no-brainer'.
One of the 'Golden Rules' of
life is that one should lead by example. This is importantly
more so of those with positions of influence and power. Until
the US (and other exploitative Western nations) can pay a fair
price for the goods they manufacture abroad, they themselves
cannot expect to be treated with respect. What is sauce for
the goose, is also sauce for the gander - as we say in the UK.
Now let's take a look at the
US-Mexico border ...
 |
The dangers of trying to
cross the US-Mexico border illegally ... "rape, beatings,
etc."
Quote from
www.inmotionmagazine.com: "... we have to
get control of the human rights problem. We need better
training of the agents so they won't abuse the
migrants. Several of them have been indicted recently
for rape, beatings and so on."
NB. Emphasis added
(underlining).
- Roberto Martinez, director
of the U.S. / Mexico Border Program.
Also check out the
cutting-edge stories about immigration at:
www.corpwatch.org.

|
The internet is rich in
information about the US-Mexican border. Articles, images,
opinions, etc. It's all there. A simple Google search will
bring forth a wealth of useful information about this part of
the world. Then there are the satellite images that can be
acquired through software such as Google Earth.
But this website thought it
would save you a little time and research and provide some
information that may be of interest and / or use to the
reader. Here goes ...
Software (maps)
First up is an excellent
programme currently available from
Topofusion.
The trial software is not time
limited, but does have some conditions. Some of the saved
images will have the software manufacturers name stamped on
them. Alternately, you can buy the software and obtain
unadulterated images.
What does it do? Well, quite a
lot actually. Where satellite software programmes go,
Topofusion goes a lot further. Download the free version
of the programme and give it a try.
Apart from Google Earth and the
version from Microsoft, it's worth considering more direct
sources such as NASA. But if you use
Topofusion, you may not wish to search any further.
|
|
|
USFENCE
4 | Go to USFENCE:
1 -
2 -
3 -
5 -
6 -
7 |
Top of page |
|
Images
Some of the barriers dividing
Mexico and the US do look a little 'basic'. There appears to
be many ways of crossing the border and some so blatant, it's
laughable. Below is just a selection ...
[1] Nobody watching? Good! Up
and over!
Image: Unknown source

[2] Getting in - not so easy.
Getting out - easy. Common feature of border fences are that
they point inwards to Mexico. Still not much of a deterrent
though.
Image:
ourlatinamerica.blogspot.com

|
|
|
USFENCE
5 | Go to USFENCE:
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
6 -
7 |
Top of page |
|
[3] The 'Border region' -
named 'Border 2012'. See definition below ...
Under Border 2012, the shaded
area shows where there is inter-border co-operation on a range
of issues. US States are 'paired-off' with Mexican regions on
joint projects. An easy way of crossing the border?
Image: US EPA

[4] Afraid of heights? Try
swimming around the border ...
Image: mariposa-yosemite.net

|
|
|
USFENCE
6 | Go to USFENCE:
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
7 |
Top of page |
|
[5] ... you could just try to
walk through (part fence, part ... nothing!) ...
Image: mariposa-yosemite.net

[6] ... or hitch a ride on
the train!
Image: mariposa-yosemite.net

|
|
|
USFENCE
7 | Go to USFENCE:
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 |
Top of page |
|
[7] An opportunity in Arizona
- allegedly America's most overrun State?
Image: Wikimedia Commons

[8] A more relaxed crossing?
Image: blogs.chron.com


Got any good images or stories?
Please send them this way.
|
|
|
©
NoHumanity.com

Go to USFENCE:
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 |
Top of page
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Google Ads |
|
|
|
Advertise
here |
|
160 pixel width by any
length up to 600 pixels. Rates are as described on our 'Ad
Rates' page |
|
Example:
This is an 160 x 600 pixel
slot. You can place your single advertisement here for
only *£768.00 for 1 calendar month or *£192.00 for 1 week
See our
table of charges for discounts
*Rest of the world, please
enquire |
|
|
|
|